To practice inclusion, we need to let go of designer-centered design

A graduate design student recently reached out for advice on her project to enhance a public space in northern Brooklyn. She was curious about how she could center peoples’ voices in her design processes and expressed frustration that when she tried to interview folks, they didn’t want to engage. I listened as she shared the interview questions she had prepared, her observations on the lack of seating options, and her conclusion that the space needed more benches. While she sought guidance on how to adapt her research methods to be more inclusive, I saw that the fundamental shift she needed to make was not in her methodologies, but in her beliefs.

I shared my take on her predicament: “You need to know that your project is not about benches. Every time you think your project is about a ‘thing,’ it’s not — it’s about people.” After we let that marinate for a moment, we went on to have a more relaxed and real conversation about how as designers, we need to let go and engage people as our partners, not objects, in the design process. This shift in mindset enabled her to renew her approach from a perspective of humility and inquiry.

When we as designers or researchers create predetermined solutions and then try to validate them through an “inclusive” or “participatory” research process, at best we design something that prioritizes our own ideas, and at worst we risk disrespecting and harming people we are intending to design with. More than any technique or tool, we need to ground our work in a belief that people matter —their experiences, ideas, and aspirations can and need to be centered genuinely and rigorously throughout the design process in a way that is not extractive, transactional, or symbolic.

We need to let go of our power if we want to practice inclusion. The traditions, trainings, and roles of designers are so entrenched in legacy power dynamics that it may feel daunting or disorienting to know how to start. In my experience, self-education and deep reflection with supportive peers and mentors is the way to develop and deepen a practice that examines harmful approaches and seeds new habits rooted in an understanding of power, identity, and systemic inequities. Like any meaningful change, this takes time and it takes a village. Here are a few favorite practitioners and resources I deeply appreciate and rely on in my own learning and unlearning journey:

  • Let’s start with respectful communication. The Art of Communicating by Thich Nath Hanh reads as a deliciously deep and direct opus on how our words are like food: they can nourish or poison. He grounds our purpose of engaging others in alleviating suffering. He takes us beyond empathy and humility (totally helpful mindsets to embody, but we can go further!), to how deep listening can be a transformative and liberating act.

We can’t be perfect at inclusive design, but we can continue learning and unlearning, and in this way, become less designer-centered and more people-centered.

Share things you love, ask your questions, and feel supported in the Community-Centered Design Slack I facilitate as part of my role as head of community at 3x3. Special thanks to Han Pham for her editing magic ✨

--

--

Mother, mixed-methods researcher, faculty at SVA’s MFA in Interaction Design, Head of Community at 3x3, New Yorker.

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Adriana Valdez Young

Mother, mixed-methods researcher, faculty at SVA’s MFA in Interaction Design, Head of Community at 3x3, New Yorker.